Key result
Personalized 0D electromechanical models track myocardial stiffness trajectories with ~1.0 cross-correlation.
Why the study?
Translating time-resolved shear wave elastography measurements into intrinsic myocardial material properties remains a complex inverse problem because the measurements combine passive structural properties with active contractility under subject-specific loading conditions.
Does a sequential inverse modeling framework using a closed-loop 0D electromechanical model accurately reproduce subject-specific myocardial stiffness trajectories and decompose passive and active myocardial properties from ultrafast shear wave elastography in healthy pediatric volunteers?
Cohort (n=20)
No
Does a sequential inverse modeling framework using a closed-loop 0D electromechanical model accurately reproduce subject-specific myocardial stiffness trajectories and decompose passive and active myocardial properties from ultrafast shear wave elastography in healthy pediatric volunteers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study establishes a computationally efficient (~15 minutes per subject) inverse modeling pipeline that decomposes non-invasive ultrafast shear wave elastography curves into distinct passive hyperelastic and active contractile myocardial parameters.
Quantifying myocardial stiffness (MS) over the full cardiac cycle offers a direct window into tissue structure and mechanics, yet translating time-resolved shear wave elastography (SWE) into intrinsic material properties remains a complex inverse problem. While SWE provides detailed stiffness quantification, these measurements combine passive structural properties with active contractility under subject-specific loading conditions. In this work, we present a computational framework to decompose these contributions using a closed-loop reduced-order electromechanical model. We formulate the personalization process as a sequential inverse problem: first, a passive hyperelastic baseline is identified from the late-diastolic window; second, active contractile parameters are estimated by fitting the full-cycle waveform using a regularized covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES). We validated this framework on a cohort of healthy pediatric volunteers (n=20). The personalized models reproduced subject-specific stiffness trajectories with high fidelity (median cross-correlation 0.997, nRMSE 1.02). Uncertainty analysis confirmed the practical identifiability of the active parameters, with stable convergence across random initializations. This study establishes a computationally efficient, robust pipeline for converting non-invasive SWE assessments into interpretable mechanical signatures, paving the way for physics-informed phenotyping in clinical cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrario et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Healthy pediatric volunteers (n=20). Closed-loop reduced-order (0D) electromechanical model parameter estimation from ultrafast shear wave elastography (SWE) vs. In vivo clinical ultrafast shear wave elastography (SWE) measurements was evaluated on Fidelity of personalized model in reproducing subject-specific myocardial stiffness trajectories (zero-lag cross-correlation and normalized root mean square error) (median cross-correlation 0.997 (IQR 0.991-0.998), median nRMSE 1.02 (IQR 0.80-1.35)). Personalized 0D electromechanical models calibrated to ultrafast shear wave elastography reproduced myocardial stiffness trajectories with median cross-correlation 0.997 and nRMSE 1.02.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: