Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) presents a computationally efficient alternative to all-atom (AA) simulations for modeling polymer systems, yet the accuracy of its predictions for emergent thermodynamic properties remains a challenge. This study builds upon our previous work, which introduced a Bayesian optimization framework for refining Martini3 force field, to validate the transferability of these optimized models to multi-component systems. We demonstrate that CG force fields, optimized against single-chain properties (density and radius of gyration), can qualitatively estimate the phase behavior of both homopolymer blends and diblock copolymer systems. Bayesian-optimized topologies for polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polystyrene (PS), and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were evaluated through direct simulation of binary blend morphologies and a PMMA-PEO (poly(ethylene oxide)) diblock copolymer system. The framework successfully predicted macroscopic phase separation in the immiscible PS-PMMA system and miscibility in the PVDF-PMMA system, with resulting density profiles showing qualitative agreement with experimental observations. Flory–Huggins interaction parameters ( χ χ ) estimated from Hildebrand solubility parameters ( δ δ ) correctly rank relative miscibilities and align qualitatively with literature trends. Our results show that optimizing for fundamental properties such as density and radius of gyration (achieving <10% error) implicitly captures the necessary thermodynamic contributions to predict complex, multi-component phase behaviors. Validation of miscibility prediction across two canonical homopolymer blends, combined with efficient parameterization of a diblock copolymer architecture, provides compelling evidence that Bayesian-optimized coarse-grained molecular dynamics is a robust and predictive tool for polymer thermodynamics, effectively bridging the gap between computational efficiency and predictive fidelity in materials discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: