Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a space mission design, computed from stated assumptions and not measured, built to measure one quantity: the fractional frequency offset between the two clocks attributed to motion along a fifth coordinate, for which the design case adopts 3.20e-18 in fractional frequency. The instrument is two spacecraft, each carrying a strontium optical lattice clock with a cryogenic silicon reference cavity, linked by a coherent two-way optical link that transfers frequency between the craft without adding noise above the clock floor. It operates from two heliocentric drift-away trajectories separated by up to 0.6 astronomical units for 4 years. The one-day measurement uncertainty is 1.60e-17 in fractional frequency; averaged over the full mission of 1461 days it falls to 4.19e-19 in fractional frequency, giving a signal-to-noise ratio of 7.64 for the design case and a five-sigma detection limit of 2.09e-18 in fractional frequency. The spacecraft has a dry mass of 680 kilograms, a wet mass of 920 kilograms including propellant, and a total electrical load of 907 watts supplied by a solar array of 3.16 square metres at the operating distance. Every performance figure in this paper comes from the deposited computation; the design is simulated, not measured, and no hardware described here has been built or flown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: