Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The form-finding of unilateral membrane structures is often addressed by solving equilibrium equations using Finite Element Methods (FEMs). In this paper, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are investigated as an alternative, in which the equilibrium equation is enforced by minimizing its residual at collocation points through neural-network training, rather than by solving a mesh-based discretized system. This alternative is particularly suitable for form-finding problems based on Membrane Equilibrium Analysis (MEA), where the unknown is a membrane governed by a second-order elliptic Partial Differential Equation (PDE) with Dirichlet boundary conditions. This paper proposes PINNs for the form-finding of unilateral membrane structures governed by prescribed Airy-stress fields and compares two formulations: a soft-Boundary Condition (soft-BC) approach, in which the boundary conditions are enforced through a penalty term, and a hard-BC approach, in which they are satisfied by construction through distance and lift functions. The two approaches are assessed on three case studies of different geometrical complexity, involving both compression-only and tension-only stress states, as well as combined self-weight, concentrated vertical loads, and horizontal actions. The results show that both formulations provide membrane surfaces in close agreement with solutions obtained with a PDE solver based on the FEM. The hard-BC formulation yields smaller errors and a smoother spatial distribution of the residual, especially near the boundary, indicating that the exact treatment of the Dirichlet conditions has a direct influence on the overall solution accuracy. The soft-BC formulation, however, still provides structurally meaningful solutions and remains attractive when a simpler implementation is preferred and a limited relaxation of the boundary data is acceptable. Overall, the study demonstrates that PINNs are a viable numerical alternative for MEA-based form-finding and that the choice between soft and hard boundary enforcement depends on the prescribed boundary condition in the structural problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sibille et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: