Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Screening construction-site photographs against safety regulations requires two decisions: which provisions apply to what is visible, and whether each is met. Passing a fixed number of relevance-ranked provisions to a judging model misses many recorded violations; widening the list causes false alarms on inapplicable provisions. We propose Risk-Controlled Applicability Set Retrieval (RCASR), which selects provisions to check from image evidence that each provision’s subject and hazardous state are visible, at a stated review budget or miss risk. On 346 photographs from 48 sites, with site-grouped cross-fitting and baselines at equal candidate counts, RCASR raised the share of recorded violations retrieved at three candidates per image from 0.515 for a lexical baseline (BM25) to 0.709. At two candidates per image it kept that baseline’s three-candidate recall after judgment and cut false alarms per image from 1.28 to 1.00. Holding the miss risk at 10% with conformal risk control required about ten candidates per image. The gains held for behaviour, housekeeping and edge provisions but not openings; on a public dataset, detection rose for two of four rules and fell for a machinery-proximity rule. The method runs on a quadruped patrol robot; its unlabelled field frames show deployment feasibility, not field accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: