Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Post-curative surveillance of solid tumors increasingly combines circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), imaging, and clinical information, yet these data are rarely integrated into validated clinical decision-support (CDS) pathways. Artificial intelligence (AI) may provide a framework for dynamic, multimodal risk estimation. To synthesize evidence and methodological approaches supporting AI-enabled integration of longitudinal ctDNA, imaging/radiomics, and clinical variables for post-curative solid tumor surveillance. This structured narrative review examined clinical surveillance evidence, longitudinal ctDNA modeling strategies, multimodal data-fusion approaches, and decision frameworks for discordant ctDNA–imaging findings. The synthesis emphasized recurrence-risk discrimination, molecular lead time, dynamic prediction, multimodal integration, and requirements for prospective CDS evaluation. Longitudinal ctDNA consistently improves recurrence-risk stratification and can identify molecular relapse before radiologic recurrence across several solid tumors. Joint longitudinal–survival models, Bayesian updating, and machine-learning approaches enable time-updated risk estimation while accounting for serial measurements and uncertainty. Multimodal models combining ctDNA with imaging/radiomics and clinical variables demonstrate incremental prognostic discrimination compared with single-modality approaches. However, discordant ctDNA–imaging states remain a major translational challenge, and predictive performance does not by itself establish clinical utility. AI-enabled multimodal surveillance could transform post-curative monitoring from static assessment toward continuously updated, interpretable risk estimation. Prospective external validation, standardized data acquisition, explicit management pathways for discordance, and clinical-utility trials are required before such systems can support routine surveillance decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramzani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: