Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Trajectory tracking of quadrotors is conventionally addressed by a range of control strategies, including cascade Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) loops, linear Model Predictive Control (MPC) designed around a hover-linearized model, feedback linearization, sliding-mode control, and nominal nonlinear MPC (NLMPC). Each of these approaches, however, suffers from inherent limitations: linear schemes lose accuracy under aggressive maneuvers, large attitude excursions, and strong nonlinear couplings; feedback linearization relies on exact cancellation of the nonlinear dynamics and degrades rapidly when the dynamic model is not precisely known; sliding-mode controllers are prone to chattering and require conservative disturbance bounds; and nominal NLMPC offers no guarantee of constraint satisfaction in the presence of disturbances and model uncertainty. To overcome these limitations, this article develops a robust Tube-based NLMPC for the full nonlinear 12-state quadrotor model, explicitly accounting for inertia uncertainties along the x , y , and z axes as well as bounded additive disturbances acting on the states. The tube-based formulation optimizes a nominal disturbance-free trajectory online while an ancillary feedback law confines the true state within a robust invariant tube around it, thereby guaranteeing robust constraint satisfaction. Recursive feasibility, asymptotic stability of the nominal closed loop, and input-to-state stability of the perturbed system are formally established. The proposed controller is benchmarked against a conventional cascade PID scheme in constant-reference and helical-path tracking scenarios under injected disturbances. Simulation results show that the Tube NLMPC achieves lower tracking error, faster settling, reduced oscillations, and markedly superior disturbance rejection, while its average per-step computation time of 3.86 ms-well within the 100 ms sampling interval-confirms its real-time feasibility and practical suitability for deployment in unpredictable operating environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahrizi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: