Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective Osteosarcoma prognosis remains challenging, and reliable molecular determinants are lacking. We integrated multi-dimensional functional genomic and transcriptomic data to construct a prognostic model and investigated the key candidate gene CCT3 in osteosarcoma malignancy. Methods We intersected CRISPR-Cas9 dependency genes with differentially expressed genes to derive a 64-gene candidate pool, followed by stepwise Cox regression to build a risk model. Model performance was validated in training and external cohorts. Immune microenvironment, drug sensitivity, and experimental validation were performed following CCT3 knockdown. Results An 8-gene risk model was constructed and significantly stratified overall survival. The high-risk group showed lower immune scores, reduced immune-cell infiltration, and downregulation of multiple immune checkpoint genes, indicating an immune-poor phenotype. Among 7 drugs with differential sensitivity, the high-risk group was more sensitive to 6 agents, including AZ6102, while showing resistance to Entospletinib. CCT3 was overexpressed in osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines; its knockdown suppressed proliferation and clonogenicity. Mechanistically, CCT3 depletion attenuated Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and reduced stemness markers CD24 and c-MYC. Conclusion Our integrative approach establishes an effective prognostic model for osteosarcoma and identifies CCT3 as a pro-tumorigenic gene, likely through the beta-catenin/c-MYC axis, representing a promising prognostic biomarker and therapeutic vulnerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: