Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Insider nurse researchers bring contextual knowledge, professional credibility, relationships and commitment to the issue under inquiry. These can strengthen action research, but may also shape assumptions, participation, interpretation and decisions about closure. AIM: To examine the practical and methodological challenges of undertaking a nurse-led appreciative inquiry study as a professional insider, and to propose 'responsible closeness' as a conceptual framework for navigating the complexities of insider research. DISCUSSION: This account was informed by reflective and documentary materials generated during the research process. Four tensions made responsible closeness visible: insider assumptions and collaborative challenge; professional identity and facilitative influence; advocacy and openness to inquiry; and responsible closure of the collaborative research phase. Across these tensions, responsible closeness involved using insider knowledge while keeping assumptions, interpretations and researcher influence open to reflexive and collaborative scrutiny. Reflexivity became methodologically significant when it changed subsequent questioning, facilitation, interpretation, action or plans for closure. CONCLUSION: Responsible closeness offers a conceptual framework for understanding how an insider position can be navigated in action research. It helps insider researchers draw on their professional knowledge, familiarity and relationships while remaining accountable for how these shape the inquiry, subsequent actions and the knowledge generated. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Insider researchers should create explicit opportunities for participants to challenge emerging interpretations and approach closure as a collaborative phase that acknowledges what has been achieved and what remains unfinished.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: