Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study developed thermoresponsive poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes incorporating oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB)-derived cellulose and SiO2–poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (SiO2–PNIPAM) particles for methylene blue (MB) removal and thermally assisted cleaning. Membranes were fabricated via non-solvent-induced phase separation and characterized in terms of morphology, porosity, pore size, hydrophilicity, permeability, antifouling behaviour, and dye rejection. The incorporation of OPEFB-derived cellulose and SiO2–PNIPAM particles significantly altered membrane structure and surface properties. The combined membrane (PVDF-CP) containing OPEFB-derived cellulose and SiO2–PNIPAM exhibited the highest porosity (50.09 ± 1.26%), smallest mean pore size (16.29 ± 0.45 nm), and lowest water contact angle (63.66 ± 4.73°). Although the cellulose-modified membrane showed the highest pure water permeability (66.29 ± 2.21 L m−2 h−1 bar−1), PVDF-CP achieved the highest MB rejection of 76.99% and 83.60% before and after cleaning, respectively, together with a flux recovery ratio (FRR) of approximately 97%. The SiO2–PNIPAM particles modified membrane exhibited the highest FRR (122%) owing to the thermoresponsive behaviour of PNIPAM. The results demonstrate that the combined incorporation of OPEFB-derived cellulose and SiO2-PNIPAM particles enhanced membrane hydrophilicity, fouling resistance, cleaning efficiency, and dye removal performance. These findings highlight the potential of sustainable biomass-assisted thermoresponsive membranes for wastewater treatment applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: