Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PORTEC-4a was the first to incorporate molecular-integrated profile-guided adjuvant treatment in early-stage high-intermediate-risk endometrial cancer (EC), demonstrating non-inferiority. Here, adverse events (AE), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and sexual health are reported. 564 patients were randomised to molecular-based adjuvant treatment ( n = 367) or standard vaginal brachytherapy (VBT, n = 197). In the molecular-profile arm, patients underwent observation, VBT or pelvic radiotherapy according to molecular-integrated profile. HRQoL and sexual functioning were assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 and EN24 modules and compared with age-matched normative data. Median follow-up was 58.1 months; 523 (92.7%) patients were evaluable. Grade 1–2 AEs were less frequent in the molecular-profile arm at treatment completion compared with the standard arm (28.3% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.01), without differences in grade 3–4 AEs ( p = 0.46). Throughout follow-up, treatment-related grade 3–4 AEs were rare (1% vs. 2%). HRQoL remained comparable to normative data over time. Sexual interest/activity was similar between arms, but lower than normative values. 75.5% of patients reported ≥1 reason for sexual inactivity; disease-related sexual inactivity decreased from 24.2% to 9.2% at 3 years. Molecular-guided adjuvant treatment for patients with high-intermediate riskEC is associated with low toxicity, preserved HRQoL and slightly reduced sexual activity due to personal factors (no partner, sex not important in their relationship or partner-related medical issues) rather than their own illness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heerik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: