Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sustainability education requires learners to develop knowledge, values, competencies and action-oriented behaviors, yet existing instruments capture only parts of this construct knowledge in the Sulitest and Assessment of Sustainability Knowledge; consciousness and attitudes in the Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire and Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale, rely largely on school-age or Western samples, and offer limited confirmatory evidence of their structure. To fill this gap, this study developed and validated the four-dimensional St Aloysius- Sustainability Literacy Scale (SA-SLS) instrument, capturing Cognitive Sustainability Literacy, Ethical and Value Orientation, Transformative Competencies, and Sustainability Engagement and Action. The scale development consisted of a rigorous series of literature-based item generation, expert review and pre-testing, as well as an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) on one random subsample followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on an independent subsample of 1,068 university students. A robust four-factor structure was confirmed. Factor loadings of items ranged from 0.74 to 0.885. Internal consistency was good for all constructs, with Cronbach's alpha and Composite Reliability (CR) above 0.70 (CR = 0.846–0.884). Convergent validity was confirmed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE = 0.563–0.602), discriminant validity was confirmed using the Fornell–Larcker criterion, with maximum shared variance being lower than AVE for all constructs. Content validity was also confirmed, with Aiken's V coefficients above 0.70 for representativeness, importance, and clarity for all 41 items. The fit of the model indices were adequate or above recommended values (χ 2 /df = 2.236, RMSEA = 0.042, SRMR = 0.048, CFI = 0.977, TLI = 0.967, NFI = 0.948, GFI = 0.922, AGFI = 0.923). These results support a multidimensional, four-factor conceptualization of sustainability literacy comprising knowledge, values, competencies, and action, extending prior single- or partial-dimension instruments by operationalizing these four dimensions within one validated measurement model. To summarize, these findings suggest that the SA-SLS offers a psychometrically sound advance in operationalizing sustainability literacy as a multidimensional construct, providing higher education institutions with a tool to assess and benchmark sustainability literacy for curriculum design and SDG-aligned policy, with future work needed to validate it across multiple institutions and cultural contexts to establish broader generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reji et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: