Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fertilisation in mammals is preceded by a multilayered selection process shaped by more than 600 million years of evolution. The female reproductive tract acts as a sequential filter-through vaginal pH, cervical mucus, the uterotubal junction, the isthmic sperm reservoir, the cumulus matrix and the zona pellucida-such that only a few hundred capacitated, structurally and molecularly competent spermatozoa reach the ampulla. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), introduced in 1992, bypasses these filters. Advanced techniques-including IMSI, physiological ICSI (PICSI), magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), microfluidic sorting and deep-learning image classification-aim to restore part of this discriminatory capacity in the laboratory. Systematic reviews and current professional guidance indicate that none has produced a robust improvement in cumulative live birth in unselected assisted-reproduction populations, although ESHRE considers microfluidic selection an option. This review maps each technique to the in vivo filter it purports to mimic, evaluates the clinical evidence, considers long-term follow-up of ICSI-conceived offspring and imprinting-disorder surveillance, and asks whether targeted, mechanism-based selection in defined subgroups could succeed where unselected use has not. Evidence from non-human mammals-colloid and microfluidic selection in horses and cattle, sex-sorted semen, species differences in ICSI efficiency and mouse ICSI with DNA-damaged spermatozoa-is used to test the framework where human data are observational only. The evolutionary perspective is used as a design framework: for each technique, it identifies the mechanism to be recapitulated and the maternal, pregnancy and offspring outcomes by which benefit and safety should be judged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enver Kerem Dirican (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: