Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
3D concrete printing (3DCP) offers a transformative approach to industrialized construction and housing solutions. However, its reliance on high Portland cement (PC) mixes raises sustainability concerns. This study explores alkali-activated materials (AAM) as low-carbon alternatives, leveraging an industrial by-product (ground granulated blast furnace slag—GGBFS) to enhance environmental performance of 3DCP mortars. The novelty of this study lies in demonstrating that, despite equivalent activation parameters, one-part (“just-add-water”) and two-part AAM systems exhibit substantially different fresh-state, rheological, and printing behavior in extrusion-based 3DCP—an activation-method-dependent divergence that, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, has not been previously reported. Rheological behavior (dynamic yield stress, plastic viscosity, and structural build-up), flow table spread evolution, hydration kinetics (via isothermal calorimetry), and mechanical performance (cast and extruded specimens of selected mixes) were systematically evaluated. Results reveal that one-part mixes exhibit greater flowability when compared to two-part mixes (140–239 mm vs. 135–210 mm), inferior dynamic yield stress (35.94–93.61 Pa vs. 52.91–152.30 Pa), and slower structural build-up, while maintaining comparable compressive and flexural strengths as the equivalent two-part mortars. These findings demonstrate the potential viability of AAM for extrusion-based 3DCP and highlight the critical influence of activation method and water content on extrudability and performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: