Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Precise weed detection in complex cotton fields is a critical prerequisite for site-specific weed control and precision management. To address the challenges of small weed targets, high inter-class similarity, occlusion, and illumination variations that affect detection accuracy in cotton fields, this paper proposes CWD-YOLO, an improved model based on YOLO26n. CWD-YOLO reconstructs the original backbone network using GhostNetV3 to enhance low-level visual feature extraction, integrates TSSA into the C2PSA module to strengthen high-level semantic feature representation, and adopts AssemFormer in the C3k2 feature fusion stage to improve multi-scale local–global feature fusion. These designs enhance the detection of small, weak-feature, and occluded weed targets. On the CottonWeedDet12 benchmark dataset, CWD-YOLO achieved Precision, Recall, mAP@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 values of 94.3%, 87.9%, 93.1%, and 87.6%, respectively, outperforming the baseline YOLO26n by 2.9, 2.7, 2.0, and 1.5 percentage points. Furthermore, in multi-dataset adaptability experiments on three external weed datasets, namely 3WDataset, 6WEED, and 3SeasonWeedDet10, CWD-YOLO consistently outperformed the baseline model, indicating its adaptability to different weed detection scenarios. The experimental results demonstrate that CWD-YOLO effectively improves weed detection accuracy in complex cotton fields and provides an effective method for precise field weed identification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: