Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Objectives: We compared the prognostic value of the preoperative hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) index and Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index (CIPI) after colorectal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 264 patients who underwent colorectal adenocarcinoma resection between 2014 and 2019. The primary Cox model entered both log2-transformed indices simultaneously and adjusted for age, sex, ASA class, neoadjuvant treatment, and recorded pathological stage. Discrimination was assessed using 3- and 5-year time-dependent ROC analysis and Harrell’s C-index. Cut-off-based analyses were exploratory. Results: Over a median follow-up of 86.9 months, 120 patients (45.5%) died. In the primary model, the adjusted hazard ratio per doubling was 0.822 for HALP (95% CI 0.661–1.023) and 1.058 for CIPI (95% CI 0.978–1.145). The 3-year AUCs were 0.649 for HALP and 0.699 for CIPI (p = 0.261). The 5-year AUCs were 0.631 and 0.636, respectively (p = 0.887). In exploratory analyses, the cohort-derived high-CIPI group had poorer adjusted survival (aHR 1.703, 95% CI 1.138–2.548). Both continuous indices were associated with survival in stage I–III disease, whereas neither was statistically significant in patients without neoadjuvant treatment. Conclusions: Both indices showed modest discrimination. The adjusted associations varied by model and subgroup. Incremental clinical value was not established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çıklar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: