Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
School-route streets shape children’s experiences, yet street-view assessments may miss children’s eye-height environments and conflate direct ratings with model-inferred perceptions. Our framework combined reconstructed 1.00 m imagery, children’s ratings, and explainable machine learning at nine primary schools in Harbin, China. Reconstruction was compared with real 1.00 m photographs at 45 sites. Seventy-two children rated 150 scenes for safety, accessibility, comfort, and interest; associations with 15 environmental indicators were analysed separately from proxy-model results. A frozen SigLIP–SVR model generated perception-proxy scores at 1,908 sites, analysed with spatially blocked XGBoost and out-of-fold SHAP across three urban spatial types. Reconstruction performance was mixed; only sky proportion showed a supported improvement under a validity mask. Green View Index had the highest predictive importance (20.26%), while indicator rankings and responses varied by dimension and spatial type. Among the 60 direct-rating tests, 25 remained significant after global BH-FDR correction. Permutation-based hotspot analysis identified six persistent Tier I hotspots and 22 non-persistent Tier III cells, with six Tier I hotspots in the New Planned Large-Block Area. Findings support context-sensitive street assessment, but turning points and hotspots are model-derived screening signals, not validated thresholds or confirmed deficiencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: