Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The equivalence principle — that all bodies fall alike — has been tested to one part in 1e15, but almost always with unpolarised matter. Spin changes the question: in theories where torsion propagates, a spin-polarised body carries an axial charge that an unpolarised body lacks, and a polarised source's torsion field would pull the two bodies differently, violating the equivalence principle in a spin-dependent channel that ordinary tests never address. This paper computes both sides of that channel. In Einstein-Cartan theory the predicted differential acceleration is exactly zero, for the same reason as in the torsion-balance analysis: torsion does not leave the source matter, so a falling body, polarised or not, feels only the metric. For propagating extensions, a polarised test body of 10 grams carrying 1e23 polarised spins, falling toward an Earth whose crustal electrons are taken to have a geomagnetically aligned fraction giving a net source charge of 1e42 spins, converts the Eotvos bounds into coupling limits: eta below 1e-13 (laboratory) bounds the axial coupling at g squared over 4 pi below 1.26e-40, and eta below 1e-15 (space-mission class) bounds it at 1.26e-42 — about five orders of magnitude above the electron's gravitational coupling of 1.75e-45 at the laboratory level, and three orders at the space level. Spin-equivalence tests are thereby identified as the closest approach to gravitational-strength spin couplings among force experiments. Computed from stated assumptions, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: