Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) emphasises the integration of sustainability across subject areas, including language education. This study examines ESD representation in Grade 5 and Grade 6 Turkish language textbooks developed within the Türkiye Century Education Model (TYMM). Four textbooks comprising 12 themes were analysed through qualitative document analysis using eight Global Citizenship Education/Education for Sustainable Development (GCED/ESD) thematic areas and three ESD learning domains: cognitive, socio-emotional, and behavioural. Representation was coded as not represented (0), implicit (1), or explicit (2). Two researchers coded the corpus independently. Raw agreement between the coders was 78.47%, with a linearly weighted Cohen’s κ of 0.593. The thematic areas, however, were not represented to the same extent. Human Survival and Well-being was the most widely represented thematic area, followed by Cultural Diversity and Tolerance, Peace and Non-violence, and Human Rights. Climate Change, Gender Equality, and Sustainable Consumption and Production appeared less frequently across the themes. In terms of learning domains, cognitive and socio-emotional representation was equal, with each accounting for 36.4% of the total descriptive score; the behavioural domain accounted for the remaining 27.1%. Of the 78 domain-level decisions in which ESD was represented, 79.5% were explicit. Overall, the findings indicate the potential of mother-tongue language textbooks to provide opportunities for ESD, while highlighting areas for broader thematic coverage and more consistent behavioural engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
GÜNEŞ et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: