Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Under critical maneuvers like high-speed emergency steering, conventional Linear Model Predictive Control (LMPC) suffers from insufficient path-tracking accuracy, owing to coupled effects of multiple sources of model uncertainties -including model simplification errors, parameter perturbations, and unmodeled dynamics, as well as a limited capability to characterize highly nonlinear vehicle dynamics, which may even lead to safety issues like trajectory deviation or instability of intelligent vehicles. To tackle these challenges, this paper proposes a Model Uncertainty-Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (MU-NMPC) algorithm for lateral path tracking that accounts for model uncertainties. The framework initiates by establishing a Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) structure using a nonlinear two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) vehicle model, which is solved via Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP). Furthermore, a state-error-based uncertainty compensation mechanism is developed to mitigate model uncertainties through online closed-loop feedback identification and real-time filtering for prediction errors estimation. Finally, the efficacy of the proposed MU-NMPC algorithm is verified through both simulations tests and SpeedGoat-based rapid control prototyping (RCP) experiments. Compared with LMPC, MU-NMPC exhibits superior performance under extreme conditions: it not only maintains sufficient control margins and enhances the vehicle’s emergency handling capability but also significantly improves path-tracking accuracy. Moreover, in the presence of parameter variations such as ±20% perturbations in vehicle mass and moment of inertia, MU-NMPC effectively suppresses the rate of change in path tracking error, demonstrating strong robustness performance in complex operational scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: