Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A kinematic and dual-rigid-body dynamic framework is developed for a three-degree-of-freedom 3-UPRP+UP parallel platform. Structural offset and passive slider motion are embedded in closed-form limb constraints, yielding inverse and numerical forward kinematics, an actuator-rate Jacobian, and a stroke-constrained workspace. The Jacobian differs from central finite differences by at most 1.01 × 10 − 7 mm / rad , and actuator lengths differ from MSC Adams by at most 0.00484 mm. The DRB inverse-dynamics model separates the lower swing frame from the upper moving platform and retains the peripheral cylinder, rod, and slider bodies. Generalized-force RMSEs against MSC Adams are 0.0134 N ⋅ m , 0.0105 N ⋅ m and 2.76 × 10 − 5 N for roll, pitch, and relative heave; a single-rigid-body model raises the heave error to 102.59 N. A DRB-based computed-torque controller with preload-centered allocation is formulated, with nominal exponential stability and uniform ultimate boundedness under bounded disturbances. Co-simulation gives amplitude ratios of 0.9090, 0.9371, and 0.8483. Prototype tests are limited to geometric calibration, static pitch validation, and single-axis vertical-acceleration comparison. The static pitch and acceleration RMSEs are 0.0869 ∘ and 0.1647 m / s 2 , respectively, with an acceleration correlation coefficient of 0.8543. The full controller is evaluated only on the virtual prototype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: