Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urban road-safety planning requires a transparent basis for identifying where engineering, enforcement and publicawareness resources may be prioritized. This study develops a reproducible framework to assess reported road accident burden across 50 Indian million-plus cities using official statistics. The 2023 city-level dataset contains 81,144 reported accidents, 17,255 fatalities and 73,476 injuries. The framework combines aggregate trend analysis, entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), K-means clustering, ranking sensitivity analysis and a two-axis burden– severity matrix. Entropy weighting assigns weights of 0.3412, 0.2695 and 0.3894 to accidents, fatalities and injuries, respectively. Delhi, Bengaluru and Jabalpur are the three highest-ranked cities under the composite burden score. A five-cluster solution yields a silhouette coefficient of 0.4387 and mean pairwise adjusted Rand index of 0.9929 across 20 initializations. Rank agreement is high under equal, accident-focused and injury-focused weights, but lower when fatalities receive dominant emphasis. The results show that city prioritization depends on the selected outcome dimension. The framework is a screeninglevel decision-support approach: because consistent city-specific exposure denominators are unavailable, the results represent reported burden and must not be interpreted as exposure-adjusted crash risk or causal evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lakshmi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: