Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Crop diversification is widely proposed as a resilience strategy, but whether regional crop diversity buffers crop-specific productivity after wildfire exposure remains uncertain. This study examines seven Portuguese agricultural regions using exposure years 2012–2024 and crop-specific productivity at t + 1. The primary sample comprises 972 Region × Crop × Year observations nested in 91 Region × Year cells. Pre-fire diversity is measured by a one-year-lagged Shannon index based on 11 crop groups. Models include Region × Crop and Year fixed effects, a lagged crop-area control, and few-cluster inference based on null-imposed wild cluster restricted bootstrap tests with Webb weights. Neither wildfire exposure nor crop diversity shows a statistically supported main association with subsequent productivity. The wildfire × diversity interaction is positive but unsupported at t + 1 (β = 0.0931; p = 0.491), t + 2 (β = 0.0623; p = 0.699), and t + 3 (β = 0.0348; p = 0.778). The interaction changes sign in a supplementary region-specific linear-trend specification (β = −0.0410), indicating sensitivity to regional trajectories; none of the preferred hypothesis tests support the proposed buffering mechanism. The results do not establish regional crop diversity as a wildfire-specific buffer for crop-specific productivity in this design, while remaining consistent with potential diversification benefits for other outcomes and spatial scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koengkan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: