Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aqueous proton batteries based on strong mineral acids can provide high conductivity but may accelerate electrode dissolution and hardware degradation. Here, few-layer, sulfur-deficient MoS2 nanosheets are paired with concentrated phosphoric acid (H3PO4), and multinuclear NMR, self-diffusion, and conductivity measurements are used to identify a composition that balances carrier availability and mobility. The highest conductivity (192 mS·cm–1) is found at 0.18 mole fraction (8.3 M) H3PO4, where a Nernst–Einstein partition assigns ≈17% of the conductivity to vehicular H3O+, ≤17% to H2PO4, and ≈65% to structural (Grotthuss-type) transport. The binder-free MoS2-derived electrode delivers 243.0 mA·h·g–1 at 1.0 A·g–1 and retains 88% after 1000 cycles, compared with 79% in a 0.5 M H2SO4 benchmark. Density functional theory (DFT) shows that proton storage in 2H-MoS2 cannot account for this charge in the galvanostatic window (≈0.22–0.87 V vs RHE): hydrogen binding is strongly unfavorable on the basal plane (ΔGH = +2.02 eV) and in the van der Waals gallery (+1.59 eV), and sulfur vacancies (–0.17 eV) are occupied only below ≈0.17 V vs RHE. Because MoS2 becomes unstable toward oxidation above 0.37–0.47 V vs RHE and MoO3 stores protons at ≈0.1–0.35 V vs RHE, we propose that a partially oxidized MoOx surface layer stores part of the charge, with background currents contributing the remainder. Within the gallery, DFT identifies a low-barrier sulfur-mediated proton relay (S–H···S transfer, 0.06 eV) that is unoccupied at the operating potentials, and phosphate binds sulfur vacancies slightly more strongly than bisulfate, consistent with a passivating role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Bataineh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: