Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A reduced model of internal rotary burnishing couples Hertz–expanding-cavity indentation, Euler–Bernoulli crown bending and loading-chain compression through incremental equilibrium from preload. The resulting residual geometry supplies an in-service contact model. In the reference numerical case with a steel crown and an Al–Cu–Mg tube, 20 μm of additional travel from a 20 N preload gives a total force of 408 N, a maximum penetration of 14.1 μm and an edge-to-centre residual sag of 2.70 μm. Indentation, crown bending and loading-chain compression account for 60.9%, 19.7% and 19.4% of this travel, respectively. The two process-derived cells have texture area fractions of 0.03–0.04 and specific cavity volumes of 0.05–0.07 μm. In a separate 1×1 mm periodic-contact benchmark at 5 MPa, the directly integrated rough-land approach is 1.07 μm, compared with a smooth-contact rigid-plane offset of 2.85 nm. Global sensitivity identifies yield strength as the leading input for residual sag (total-order Sobol index STi=0.57); total-force sensitivity is greatest for preload, followed by crown thickness. With the Hertz–expanding-cavity transition markers fixed, the prescribed calibration-uncertainty distributions give Monte Carlo 5th–95th percentile intervals of 2.2–3.3 μm for residual sag and 387–426 N for total force. Variance reductions obtained by fixing individual inputs in this calibration scenario identify yield strength as the main calibration priority for residual geometry, and loading-chain stiffness and local crown thickness as priorities for force transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bashmur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: