Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Breakthrough hit-finding platforms rarely become routine after the first novel proof-of-concept and realistically take 20−30 years to develop fully. Across FBDD, DEL, Aptamer, and PROTAC drug discovery technologies, the persistent rate-limiting issue in platform development is not the founding concept alone (e.g., chemistry) rather, it is often more likely due to organizations underestimating the time to develop a robust technique in-house and the significant supporting infrastructure and talent required to transform novel technologies into routine hit-finding drug discovery platforms. A consequence for not being “all in” on its development can be a dilution of effort across programs that may lead to fewer clinical candidates and a decrease in ROI. As a result, it can take decades not years to develop a platform. Using lessons learned from these four platforms, this Perspective identifies key (and often unappreciated) hurdles that each new technology needs to resolve before becoming a mainstream hit-finding drug discovery platform driving FDA approvals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William T. Windsor (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: