Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The thermal runaway fire of lithium-ion battery energy storage systems shows nonlinear propagation and extreme thermal shock. Traditional standard temperature-rise curves, such as ISO 834 and HC (Hydrocarbon), cannot accurately characterize the thermal environment evolution of battery energy storage system fires. Based on full-scale combustion tests of 30 and 220 kWh multi-scale energy storage cabinets, this study proposes a method combining time-dimensionless normalization, principal component analysis–KMeans clustering, worst-case envelope extraction, double-exponential fitting, time-axis calibration, and dynamic-weight fusion. It converts multi-condition, multi-point temperature data into a unified standard curve. Results show that top-interior measuring points have strong thermal accumulation and stable features for representing the worst-case fire scenario. The derived battery energy storage system’s curve heats faster than ISO 834 but slower than HC. This method removes test-condition deviations and offers a robust engineering benchmark for battery energy storage system’s fire-resistance design, material selection, fire protection evaluation, and safety assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: