Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examined cultivation-dependent proteolytic responses in clarified supernatants of two infant-derived lactobacilli (TRM58163 and TRM59525) using single-factor screening, a 12-run Plackett–Burman design, a five-point one-dimensional bracketing scan, and Box–Behnken response-surface modelling. The original optimisation stage yielded relative, assay-dependent casein–Folin responses on an unvalidated nominal scale, without subtraction of sterile-medium background; these values are not absolute enzyme activities. The practical selected media contained 32/31 g/L yeast extract/glucose at nominal pre-sterilisation pH 6.0 for TRM58163 and 30/35 g/L at pH 6.3 for TRM59525. In independently cultivated, matrix-matched confirmation (three batches, three bottles per group per batch), medium-background-corrected apparent casein–Folin responses were 7.99 ± 0.26 versus 22.21 ± 0.88 U/mL for TRM58163 and 7.27 ± 0.21 versus 23.61 ± 0.74 U/mL for TRM59525 (basal versus selected medium); mixed-model selected-to-basal ratios were 2.78 and 3.25, respectively. An independent azocasein readout supported the direction of change. The results demonstrate enhanced crude-supernatant assay response under the selected cultivation conditions, not increased proteinase synthesis per cell or functionality in food or feed matrices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: