Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Five experimental Ti-alloyed martensitic stainless steels derived from 17-4PH, with nominal Ti additions of 1–5 wt.%, were investigated to compare electrochemical corrosion behavior, Vickers microhardness, and exploratory numerical assessments. The alloys were produced by vacuum arc melting, solution-treated, and subjected to selected aging schedules. Optical microscopy, SEM–BSE/EDS characterization, image-derived descriptors, microhardness measurements, and potentiodynamic polarization tests in 3.5 wt.% NaCl were employed. The five alloy–aging conditions constituted a non-factorial design with simultaneous compositional and processing variations. P5–H900 exhibited the lowest reported corrosion current density (0.419 µA cm−2) and highest polarization resistance (61.67 kΩ cm2), together with a mean microhardness of 570.6 HV0.2. Its corrosion current density was approximately 93.3-fold lower than that of P1–H900. Stern–Geary recalculation demonstrated internal numerical consistency, whereas leave-one-out cross-validation revealed substantial regression instability. Multicriteria rankings depended on criterion selection, normalization, and weighting assumptions. The absence of independent electrochemical replication and a processing-matched unmodified reference limits causal interpretation and statistical validation. These results support condition-specific comparisons and identify candidates for further controlled investigation rather than establishing an isolated titanium effect or validated predictive optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onici et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: