Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Image-based deep learning offers efficient prediction of complex material responses, but its integration with computational mechanics requires a clear distinction between predictive performance and physical interpretability. This study presents a simulation-supervised framework combining finite element damage mechanics with a hybrid Vision Transformer–convolutional neural network for peak-stress classification and attribution assessment in heterogeneous concrete microstructures. Three-dimensional aggregate geometries were reconstructed from micro-computed-tomography images segmented using a U-Net architecture. Monte Carlo sampling was then used to generate 330 two-dimensional microstructures with controlled nominal pore area fractions between 1 % and 11 %. Nonlinear finite element analyses provided peak-stress responses, class labels, and tension-damage fields. The samples were divided into higher- and lower-peak-stress response groups using the dataset mean, which represents a reproducible statistical partition rather than a physical damage threshold. On 100 held-out images, the proposed model achieved 92.0 % accuracy and a weighted F1-score of 91.9 %, compared with 85.0 % accuracy for the ResNet-50 baseline. Dataset-level comparison showed that the mean Spearman correlation between layer-wise relevance propagation maps and matched finite element damage fields was 0.023, compared with − 0.008 for mismatched fields and 0.122 for a pore-proximity baseline. These findings show that the model provides accurate simulation-based response classification, while its attribution maps should not be interpreted as substitutes for mechanically calculated damage fields. External validation using experimentally representative pore populations remains necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shabbır et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: