Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For microscopic decreases the suppression is mild and such events are routine. For anything macroscopic it becomes overwhelming, and for a cosmological decrease the logarithm of the probability is itself a cosmological-scale negative number. A fluctuation origin for a low-entropy branch is not merely unlikely; it is suppressed beyond any scale at which the word improbable retains meaning. The computation is performed from stated assumptions in a density-limited bounce, in which the neutron-branch limit density sets a maximum density, a finite bounce temperature, and a minimum horizon size. Headline values from the deposited calculation are: cases.one_kB.dS_kB = 1; cases.one_kB.log10_probability_ratio = -0.434; cases.photon_gas_cm3.dS_kB = 1.00e+15; cases.photon_gas_cm3.log10_probability_ratio = -4.34e+14; cases.one_mole_gas.dS_kB = 1.00e+23; cases.one_mole_gas.log10_probability_ratio = -4.34e+22; cases.stellar.dS_kB = 1.00e+60. The study is simulated and computed, not measured, and its conclusions are stated at the precision the stated assumptions support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: