Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Predicting customer lifetime value (CLV) in non-contractual retail settings is complicated by purchase sequence sparsity and heterogeneous engagement across marketing channels. Methods We propose the Cross-Channel Temporal Fusion Network (CCTFN), a dual-branch architecture combining a convolutional-recurrent temporal encoder (Conv1d → 2-layer BiGRU → 4-head attention pooling) with a residual static MLP via a per-household learned sigmoid gate, evaluated through a four-way ablation on 2,581,266 grocery transactions from 2,500 households using a strictly disjoint 547-day calibration/164-day holdout design with GroupKFold cross-validation (K = 5); causal validation employed propensity score matching (PSM) and difference-in-differences (DiD). Results The static branch alone (RMSE = 485.60, Spearman ρ = 0.8060) outperforms the full gated model (ρ = 0.7998) at N = 2,500; gated fusion outperforms concatenation by Δρ = 0.0042 (95% CI [0.0028, 0.0056]; paired t = 8.3, p < 0.01); channel-exposure variables account for only 1.50% of permutation importance yet PSM yields a causal ATT of $193.55 per household (22.8% uplift, 95% CI [$112.51, $276.70]), corroborated by DiD at $100.30. Discussion These results provide a transparent diagnostic of where temporal deep learning adds value relative to static feature engineering, and reveal a systematic asymmetry between the predictive and causal roles of channel-exposure features in retail CLV modeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faysal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: