Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To address the problems of low path planning efficiency and excessive redundant nodes in tomato harvesting manipulators, an improved RRT-APF path planning algorithm is proposed. First, a goal-biased strategy is introduced into the standard Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) framework to reduce search randomness and improve sampling efficiency. The Artificial Potential Field (APF) method is then integrated with a greedy strategy to perform obstacle avoidance and update nodes. Finally, an improved quadratic B-spline curve is applied to optimize the planned path. In a simple obstacle environment, compared with RRT, RRT*, and APF, the proposed algorithm reduces average planning time by 75.51%, 79.31%, and 52.00%, respectively, and reduces average sampling node count by 88.51%, 85.45%, and 95.78% in 2D scenarios. In 3D scenarios, average planning time is reduced by 99.57%, 99.87%, and 85.71%, and sampling node count is reduced by 98.80%, 98.97%, and 97.23%. In a complex obstacle environment, compared with RRT and RRT*, the algorithm reduces average planning time by 29.41% and 70.73%, and sampling node count by 69.23% and 77.11% in 2D scenarios; in 3D complex environments, average planning time is reduced by 99.80% and 99.86%, and average sampling node count is reduced by 99.49% and 99.38%. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved RRT-APF algorithm has significant advantages in path planning speed and efficiency, providing reliable technical support for Cartesian obstacle avoidance of tomato harvesting manipulators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: