Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper evaluates the dispersion error that would be required to mimic the downward frequency drift observed in repeating fast radio bursts, using the differentiated cold-plasma delay law, and derives the drift's frequency scaling and band-crossing scales to separate dedispersion artefacts from genuine source and lensing physics. The headline results are as follows. Dispersion error that would mimic a drift of minus 20 MHz per ms at 600 MHz: 1.3 pc cm-3; Delay slope across the 400 MHz band from a dispersion error of one unit at 600 MHz: 15.4 ms; Drift rate at 1.4 GHz if the drift scales linearly with frequency from 600 MHz: -46.7 MHz per ms; Time for a drifting sub-burst to cross the 400 MHz band at the stated rate: 20 ms; Frequency drift produced in one millisecond by a plasma lens moving at the stated scaling (illustrative one percent path change): 6 MHz; Residual dispersion precision of modern repeater timing compared with the mimicking error: 130. All values are computed from the stated assumptions and published inputs; the study is simulated and computed, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: