Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The University of Guelph developed a multi-year engagement strategic plan to reposition engagement as a measurable institutional driver of revenue, recruitment, and reputation. This paper outlines a shift from traditional activity-based engagement models to a lifecycle ecosystem approach that delivers greater strategic impact across the alumni experience. It examines how the alumni engagement team built organisational buy-in through data analysis, socialisation, and a clear connection between engagement and institutional priorities. It explores the process of redefining engagement objectives, challenging long-standing assumptions about alumni programming, and restructuring strategy around lifecycle stages, personalisation, and meaningful results rather than participation alone. The paper also details how the strategy was operationalised through cross-campus collaboration, integrated planning, digital engagement initiatives, and scalable tools, systems, and processes that support personalised alumni journeys. Early results show that a lifecycle ecosystem approach increases engagement across diverse alumni groups compared with traditional broad-based approaches. The paper argues that advancement must move beyond engagement for its own sake towards engagement grounded in valuable institutional outcomes. It provides a practical framework and repeatable approaches that advancement shops of varying sizes can adapt to support strategic transformation within their own contexts and achieve measurable long-term impact and growth. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blyth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: