Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2) is a key local tax, yet many local governments fall short of their collection targets after its administration was devolved to the regions and local tax rules were restructured by Law No. 1 of 2022 on Fiscal Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments. This study analyzes the PBB-P2 collection system and procedures at the Regional Revenue Agency (BAPENDA) of Bitung City and assesses how procedural conformity relates to revenue performance in 2021–2025. Using a qualitative descriptive single-case design, primary data came from semi-structured interviews with three purposively selected BAPENDA officials, complemented by regulations, target–realization records, and Tax Payable Notice (SPPT) data. Each procedural stage was compared with Bitung City Regional Regulation No. 1 of 2024 and Mayoral Regulation No. 63 of 2017. All stages are carried out formally, but registration, assessment, and billing conform only with qualifications and data collection is only partly evidenced: mass collection was skipped in some years for lack of budget, and billing relied on notification rather than graded enforcement. Revenue realization never reached the target, ranging from 75.19% (2023) to 95.64% (2025), and only 42.30%–57.53% of SPPT issued were paid each year. Regulatory conformity is a necessary foundation but does not by itself secure revenue performance, which also depends on keeping the tax base current, resourcing field work, and enforcing payment. The study contributes stage-by-stage evidence on post-decentralization PBB-P2 administration and identifies data updating, graded arrears billing, and targets anchored to billing potential as priorities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumendap et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: