Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A single primitive numerator, one denominator shell, and one block length suffice to encode theRiemann hypothesis in an explicit moving-window energy. We represent the arithmetic amplitudesby two real components, identify their energy with a compact moving-window transform, and recoverfixed smooth Möbius sums by a finite telescoping identity. A smooth multiplicative partition thengives a locally uniform continuation of the reciprocal zeta function. This proves that subpolynomialgrowth of the one-scale energy along dyadic scales is equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis, withoutan unproved passage from smooth sums to sharp partial sums. The diagonal has an unconditionallimiting constant of approximately 9.89144; the unresolved growth is in the signed interactionsbetween distinct denominators. A separate finite analysis groups all squarefree denominators by theiractual number of prime factors. Its real Gram matrix distinguishes a large sign-removed carrier fromthe much smaller Möbius combination and identifies a subordinate mode carrying most of the latterat the larger tested scales. Complete factor-count bookkeeping, signed contribution accounts, andrandomized controls delimit this visibility interpretation. The figures and full reproduction programsare embedded in the manuscript. The result is an exact criterion with finite operator diagnostics, nota proof of its required asymptotic bound or a uniquely physical explanation of prime cancellation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Sarnowski (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: