Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Steady contact may provide insufficient excitation for environment identification, while probing consumes force margin, and flexible-joint dynamics limit command realization. Inspired by active haptic exploration, this study combines force-margin-gated finite probing, concurrent learning, double-buffer history refreshing, and adaptive impedance control. A measured history-rank condition terminates initial exploration. An actual approach-speed condition and a robust control barrier function address contact transition and sustained contact, with one-sided release limiting execution transients. Continuous learning gives exponential convergence for constant noise-free parameters with full-rank history; noisy, slowly varying estimation is ultimately bounded on fixed-stack intervals. In 27 matched simulations, active strategies reached the rank threshold in nominal and hard environments, whereas no probing did not. Median relative stiffness errors with gating were 3.35% and 3.64%, versus 33.22% and 53.20% without probing. Refreshing reduced slowly varying stiffness error from 17.80% to 4.62%. Their relative performance depended on the environment and parameter being estimated. The simulations demonstrate the value of constrained active information acquisition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: