Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Four organic additives – carbon tetrachloride (CCl 4 ), bromoform (CHBr 3 ), methanol and ethanol – were compared as modifiers in kerosene-based oil agglomeration of Zonguldak bituminous coal fines that had been pre-cleaned by ZnCl 2 float–sink separation (2.23 wt% ash). A 4 × 4 × 3 matrix of additive type, additive concentration (0.5, 5, 50 and 150 mg/L) and kerosene dosage (5, 10 and 15% of dry coal mass) were tested in three separately prepared runs per condition (48 conditions; 144 observations). Without kerosene, less than 1% of the feed was recovered as an agglomerated product. The recovered-product mass yield depended jointly on the additive type, concentration and kerosene dosage (three-way interaction, F (18, 96) = 5.49, p < 0.001), so no single additive ranking held across kerosene levels. The highest observed mean yield, 83.4%, was obtained with ethanol at 15% kerosene and 150 mg/L, compared with 71.6% for the additive-free control. Ethanol is a priority candidate in mass-yield screening rather than a demonstrated superior modifier. Because product ash and retained kerosene were not determined, the results concern recovered-product mass yield only; ash rejection, combustible recovery and separation selectivity cannot be established, and the low feed ash further limits any assessment of selectivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şahbudak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: