Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective assessment of locomotion-related traits could improve repeatability in beef cattle structural phenotyping. This proof-of-concept study evaluated a YOLO11-based workflow for cattle detection, localization of five limb keypoints, and extraction of forelimb step length, hock angle, and hind-limb angle from controlled side-view RGB images. Detection and pose datasets contained 1,000 images from 138 steers and 1,200 images from 120 steers, respectively, with animal-level training, validation, and test partitions. On held-out animals, detection mAP@50–95 was 0.9678 and pose mAP@50–95 was 0.9950. Mean keypoint localization error was 9.86 ± 5.76 pixels, or 2.46% of the larger cattle bounding-box dimension, with percentage of correct keypoints (PCK) values of 0.943, 0.998, and 1.000 at thresholds of 0.05, 0.10, and 0.20. Forelimb step length showed good agreement between manual and model-derived measurements (MAE 4.68 cm; Lin’s CCC 0.903). Hock and hind-limb angles showed weak individual-animal concordance (CCC 0.146 and 0.317).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benicio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: