Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tidal freshwater reaches may provide early-life habitat for diadromous fishes, but long-term evidence of their use remains limited. Size-resolved records are needed as a reference for monitoring under the Yangtze fishing ban introduced in 2021. We analysed monitoring data from Jingjiang, 240 km upstream of the river mouth (2002-2017; 519 effective surveys; 10,560 measured individuals), combining size-based catch indices, environmental-window analyses and otolith Sr/Ca profiles from 115 Japanese grenadier anchovy Coilia nasus. Individuals <120 mm standard length were classified operationally as juveniles during August-October, when scale readings supported an age-0 interpretation, whereas individuals ≥180 mm were treated as a descriptive large-fish category throughout the year. Juveniles occurred in every survey year; annulus-free individuals also occurred in winter and spring. The Juvenile Recruitment Index (JRI) showed negative associations with tidal range across the April-July spawning and larval-transport period, although none of the 72 environmental-window correlations remained significant after Benjamini-Hochberg correction at a 5% false-discovery rate. Monthly models also showed a negative lagged association. None of the 40 autumn recruits sampled across four capture years had an accepted elevated Sr/Ca zone; such zones were more frequent in later developmental groups. Total catch obscured contrasting size structures: 2016 combined the series-high JRI with few large fish, whereas 2010 combined the series-high large-fish catch rate with a mid-range JRI. These findings document recurrent early-life use of a tidal freshwater reach and provide a size-resolved pre-ban reference, without establishing a disproportionate contribution to adult production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: