Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder, yet the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying its heterogeneity remain poorly understood. Previous studies have largely relied on a single molecular modality, limiting comprehensive characterization of AD heterogeneity. We aimed to characterize AD heterogeneity across bulk, single-nucleus, and spatial transcriptomic data using a common neural pathway–informed analytical framework. We developed a neural pathway-informed unsupervised learning framework based on the activities of 25 curated neural pathways. The framework was applied separately to six bulk brain transcriptomic datasets, a single-nucleus RNA sequencing dataset, and a spatial transcriptomic dataset to identify neural pathway–associated subgroups and compare their biological characteristics across resolutions. We comprehensively characterized subgroup-specific clinical features, DNA repair capacity, metabolic activity, immune signatures, cellular heterogeneity, cell-cell communication, and spatial distributions. A common three-subgroup partition characterized relatively high, intermediate, and low neural enrichment across the analyzed bulk transcriptomic datasets. Neu-H exhibited enhanced metabolic function and DNA repair capacity, lower immune signatures, and reduced tissue-level cellular heterogeneity, whereas Neu-L showed opposite characteristics and was associated with more severe clinical pathology. Compared with controls, AD samples showed lower neural gene-set enrichment in four of six bulk datasets, no significant difference in ROSMAP, and higher enrichment in GSE5281. Lower DNA-repair and metabolic gene-set enrichment and higher immune signatures were observed in most bulk datasets. Single-nucleus analyses identified neuronal subgroups with differing neural pathway enrichment and associated molecular characteristics, providing a cellular perspective on the patterns observed in bulk tissues. Neu-H excitatory and inhibitory neurons were more diverse, differentiated, metabolically active, and DNA repair–competent than Neu-L neurons, but AD neurons in all three subgroups exhibited lower DNA repair capacity, increased heterogeneity, and weakened cell–cell communication than those of controls. Spatial transcriptomics recapitulated these patterns in situ: Neu-H spots were enriched in neurons and gray matter, whereas Neu-L spots predominated in white matter and had increased microglial and oligodendrocyte precursor cell representation. Compared with controls, AD tissues showed greater representation of Neu-L spots and lower neural, DNA-repair, and metabolic gene-set enrichment scores, suggesting an association between these transcriptional patterns and AD pathology. Our neural pathway–informed cross-resolution framework characterizes AD heterogeneity at tissue, cellular, and spatial levels, highlighting associations among neural pathway expression, metabolic and DNA repair signatures, immune signatures, and tissue organization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: