Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper tests a specific and widely assumed claim: that the observed scalar perturbations could have been generated as vacuum fluctuations at the moment of a torsion-regulated bounce. The arithmetic says they could not. At the neutron-carrier bound density the Hubble scale at the bounce is H = 1.53 GeV, and the standard vacuum amplitude evaluated there is A = 1e-36 for a slow parameter of 0.01, against the observed scalar amplitude of 2.1e-9. The shortfall is a factor 2.1e+27 in power, or 4.6e+13 in amplitude, some 27.3 orders of magnitude. Varying the slow parameter across 0.003 to 0.03 changes the vacuum amplitude only between 3.4e-37 and 3.4e-36, nowhere near closing the gap. The conclusion is plain: in this framework the scalar spectrum must be inherited from fluctuations generated during the contracting phase and amplified through the bounce, not created at the bounce itself. Models that assume bounce-moment generation are assigning the spectrum to a source that is too weak by twenty-seven orders of magnitude. The study is computed from stated assumptions, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: