Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that children’s play and games constitute an anthropomorphizing artistic reflection, whose developmental power resides in their rules as a dialectical unit. Drawing on Vygotsky’s psychology and Lukács’s Marxist aesthetics, we address a gap in Cultural-Historical Psychology: the artistic role of play and its implications for development. As a first step in exploring this Marxist aesthetic field, we demonstrate how play evolves into essentially artistic behavior. We present a genetic analysis of this behavior, showing how play, understood as a reflection, gains autonomy from everyday life and thereby becomes a source of development—creating Social Situations of Development through the very process of disentangling rules. By analyzing rules as play’s dialectical unit, we demonstrate how they engender these social situations and potentiate Zones of Proximal Development. We argue that the ‘cathartic’ resolution of contradictions within play—a micro-genesis of perezhivanie —is fundamental for internalizing social meanings and developing higher psychological functions. Thus, this study not only bridges Vygotsky and Lukács but reframes play as a core psychological mechanism through which artistic, anthropomorphizing reflection drives subjective development in childhood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gutosvski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: