Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Natural Evolution of Actuality (NEA) begins with abstract independently lawful parent responsibilities M and F and primitive consequential joining Ω. Its developed quaternionic–spinorial branchand complementary causal-cone construction identify a clockwise past-facing spin-frame screw, ananticlockwise future-facing local screw, and one complete fermionic transport with Uf (2π) = −I,Uf (4π) = I. This paper fortifies that source-owned physical interpretation without replacing the twocones by a single classical particle orbit. First, an exact phase-allocation proposition characterises thetwo-cone factorisations yielding the 4π return; the equal 1/4 + 1/4 allocation is a selected symmetricrealisation, not a consequence forced by the primitive laws. Second, a new SU(4) orbit-exchangelift proves that a 2π transport may actively swap past and future cone labels while acting as −I ona selected antisymmetric electron sector; its restriction reproduces the entire original NEA SU(2)curve, not merely the endpoints. Third, an explicit coherent comparison theorem shows that a 2πrotation is invisible to an isolated projective spinor yet can reverse a subsequent reference-interferenceresult from probability one to zero. This gives a precise task-relative No Silent Erasure obstruction toremoving spinorial History. Fourth, the central −I endpoint is stable under continuous closed-loopdeformation, and we construct a noncommuting but endpoint-preserving causal transport witness.The original Ω-exchange reverses chiral accessibility and spin-frame orientation while preservingthe spinor sign, and is compatible with the new orbit exchange after a declared orbit-to-chiralityrepresentation identification. Finally, the source null-spinor joining determinant and a selected positivecomparison response remain consistent with these effects. These are exact statements for specifiedmathematical carriers, not a derivation that the observed electron uniquely has the proposed physicalcone trajectories, charge, mass or interaction strengths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darren Jeffers (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: