Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The growing body of scholarship on just transitions in food systems includes careful consideration of what justice means in the context of climate-friendly agrifood system transitions, and for whom it might be realized. Among these contributions are frameworks for examining food and agricultural visions and practices for their commitment to non-human justice in agrifood system transitions. Our manuscript seeks to extend this perspective by inquiring about the more-than-human justice implications of animal-free sustainable agriculture (also referred to by terms including stockfree organic, vegan organic, and veganic). In this context, the paper puts forward this question: If we are to work toward agrifood system transitions that are climate-friendly and fair , what does justice look like for Non-Human Animals in these transitions? Addressing this question, we identified and interrogated three agricultural standards that guide forms of animal-free sustainable agriculture (namely the (i) Stockfree Organic Standard; (ii) Veganic Standard, and (iii) Biocyclic Vegan Standard). Text of the three standards was coded for dimensions of justice (recognition, distributive, procedural, restorative) using an analytic framework developed through a literature review. Our findings led to several lessons vis-a-vis transitions out of animal-based agriculture that take justice for Non-Human Animals seriously. These include: considerations about the breadth of the spectrum of Non-Human Animals due moral regard; the importance of farmer politics and values; and the influence of external agrifood system stages, sites, and actors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seymour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: