Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated hate speech detection has advanced considerably for high-resource languages, but the availability of manually annotated resources for Hausa remains limited. This study presents HausaHateData, a multi-source corpus of 6,509 unique Hausa-language text instances collected from Twitter, Facebook, the AfriHate corpus, and other publicly available sources. Each instance was assigned a binary label of hate speech or non-hate speech. Trigger-word annotations were added to hate-speech instances where a relevant word or phrase could be identified, and all instances were assigned a positive or negative sentiment label. Two annotators independently labelled the data, producing an observed agreement of 82.99% and a Cohen’s kappa coefficient of approximately 0.65 before disagreements were resolved through discussion. The final corpus contains 2,565 hate-speech instances (39.41%) and 3,944 non-hate-speech instances (60.59%). To establish benchmark results, XLM-RoBERTa-Large, AfriBERTa and multilingual BERT (mBERT) were fine-tuned for binary classification. At the reported final epoch, mBERT achieved the highest accuracy (96.08%) and precision (98.73%), while AfriBERTa achieved the highest recall (94.15%), F1-score (94.89%) and ROC-AUC (0.977). XLM-RoBERTa-Large recorded an accuracy of 94.93% and an F1-score of 93.25%. These results provide initial benchmark evidence for Hausa hate-speech classification and demonstrate the potential value of HausaHateData for further research on low-resource African language processing. The experimental split and confusion-matrix values should be confirmed against the original prediction files before publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sulaiman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: