Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Probiotic supplementation may influence muscle metabolism in poultry, but its effects on the breast muscle metabolome of laying hens remain insufficiently characterized. We investigated the effects of a probiotic mixture containing Lactobacillus acidophilus KUEN 1607 and Pediococcus acidilactici KUEN 1608 using untargeted gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Breast muscle samples were initially obtained from 10 control and 10 probiotic-treated hens; after exclusion of one outlier, the final dataset comprised 19 samples and 143 putatively annotated metabolites. Exploratory partial least squares–discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) suggested partial group separation, although predictive performance was limited. In body weight-adjusted limma analysis of log2-transformed abundances, ten metabolites showed nominal differences (p < 0.05), all with lower estimated abundances in the probiotic group. Only N-acetyl-D-mannosamine remained significant after Benjamini–Hochberg correction (adjusted log2 fold change = −1.641; p = 0.000072; FDR = 0.0103). However, this FDR significance was not retained when the excluded sample was included in the sensitivity analysis. Exploratory KEGG analysis of VIP-selected metabolites highlighted three pathways with significant enrichment: arginine biosynthesis (FDR = 0.0113), the citrate cycle (FDR = 0.0218), and alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism (FDR = 0.0401). These pathway associations do not establish altered metabolic activity or flux. N-acetyl-D-mannosamine is a candidate finding requiring independent validation in larger cohorts using targeted quantitative metabolomics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yalçın et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: