Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a framework for approximating solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs), but their accuracy depends on the input representation and optimization procedure. We investigated a Legendre-expanded PINN (LE-PINN) that constructs tensor-product Legendre features from space–time inputs before processing them with a multilayer perceptron. LE-PINN and a standard PINN were evaluated on viscous Burgers, nonlinear Klein–Gordon, and nonlinear Schrödinger problems under fixed training-time budgets, with results reported over 10 randomized trials. For the Burgers problem, LE-PINN achieved a lower mean relative L2 error, mean squared error, maximum absolute error, and PDE residual RMS. For Klein–Gordon, it achieved a lower mean relative L2 error and mean squared error, but a higher maximum absolute error and residual RMS. For the nonlinear Schrödinger problem, the standard PINN achieved lower mean values for all four metrics. We additionally reported an Ulam–Hyers-motivated empirical error-to-residual ratio when an exact reference solution is available. Although this ratio was lower for LE-PINN in all three problems, a smaller ratio can result from a larger residual and does not establish an improved accuracy or a certified stability bound. The results demonstrate the problem-dependent benefits and limitations of tensor-product Legendre features under the evaluated computational budgets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HAMZA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: