Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Varroa destructor is controlled mainly with acaricides, but resistance-associated mutations to fluvalinate and amitraz are widespread in Korean mite populations, and both compounds have been excluded from the national subsidy program (fluvalinate in 2023; amitraz in 2026). Using records from the 2025 national active surveillance program, we describe acaricide use reported by beekeepers for the months preceding three visits (post-overwintering, post-harvest and pre-overwintering), together with infestation measured at the same visits. After exclusion of records without usable treatment information, 83, 61 and 83 Apis mellifera apiaries were analyzed (227 apiary-round observations in total). Formic acid was the mainstay (75.4–84.3%). Fluvalinate remained in use after subsidy withdrawal (24.1%, 19.7% and 9.6%). Reported amitraz use was 56.6%, 31.1% and 47.0% at the three visits. Separately, 87.9% of apiaries (94/107) were Varroa-positive pre-overwintering by powdered-sugar roll (not comparable with the post-overwintering brood-inspection rate), and 30.1% of positive colonies had ≥10 mites/100 bees. Thymol was virtually absent (≤2.4%). Use of ≥3 chemical types within a recall interval was most frequent post-overwintering (42.2%; 54.2% when drone-brood removal was also counted). These single-year, self-reported data describe practice rather than treatment efficacy; they highlight the need to evaluate available treatment options and the factors influencing treatment choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: